Thursday, 17 November 2016

Modi will fail to clean black money

Modi has made ₹500 and ₹1000 notes illegal. He says that this will reduce black money. I think not. Black money will come back with a vengeance within few years.
The conditions that cause black money remain as before. If black money was generated before, it will be generated after the notes are banned.

If Modi really wanted to eliminate black money, he would

  • Eliminate income tax and wealth tax.
  • Put a charge of say 10% on cash withdrawal from banks.
  • Put a charge of say 0.1% on all electronic transactions.
This will immediately permanently eliminate all black money. Since there is no income/wealth tax, all money is white. There will never be a black money problem, ever in India.

But a dishonest person will never take these steps, because

  • A dishonest politician wants to steal from poor / middle class; not his rich friends.
  • If there is a flat tax then the politician's friends will also have to pay taxes. That is not acceptable to corrupt government.
  • Using the sword of income tax, a corrupt government wants power to harass his opponents.


Sunday, 13 November 2016

Queues outside banks will continue till Dec 30

Rich people, with black money in cash, are willing to pay ₹500 for a cash exchange of ₹4,000.
The government has permitted a cash exchange of ₹4,000 per person till 30-Dec. Rich people are paying poor people to stand in queue outside bank. On paper, the poor person is exchanging ₹4,000; but of this ₹3,500 goes to the rich person.
The poor person stands outside one branch on day one; another bank on day two; and so on. Each day he/she will try to stand outside a different branch/bank.

So queues outside banks will never subside. They will continue till the last day of 30-Dec. If the government extends the deadline by one month, the queues will continue for one more month.


Wednesday, 9 November 2016

How can India go cashless?

For a country to go cashless, there should be one payment method accepted everywhere e.g. Using Google pay or Apple pay in London.
In London, while boarding a train (called tube), the passenger holds his mobile near a wireless device. After getting down at destination, the passenger again hold his mobile near similar device. The charges of the rail travel are automatically deducted form his chosen form of payment i.e. MasterCard, Visa, etc. While boarding a bus in London, the passenger shows his mobile to a wireless device and charges for the travel are automatically deducted. A cup of coffee, purchased at local tea stall, can be paid via mobile. Malls expect payment with mobiles. All cabs (called black taxis) accept payment via mobile.
In India say Mumbai for example, there is one card for electronic payment in buses. There is a separate card for electronic payment while traveling in metro rail. While traveling by regular rail, there is a separate card or mobile app. Auto rickshaws and cabs (yellow taxis) in Mumbai accept only cash.
In India, not only does each city/state have different forms of incompatible electronic payment methods, but multiple electronic payment methods exist within the same city. Also, many agencies accept only cash. So, for convenience, most people just pay by cash throughout India.

If India has to move towards a society with limited cash, then

  • All transports (bus, trains, metros), toll stations, post-offices, petrol stations, etc must accept payment from mobile wallet e.g. Paytm.
  • Since multiple mobile wallets exist in India, they should be inter-operable i.e. one person, using Paytm mobile wallet, can pay to another person, using Airtel Money mobile wallet.
  • There should be no extra charge while using mobile wallet, just like there is no extra charge while using cash.
  • The existing transaction limits for mobile wallet payments should be raised significantly.
  • People should be allowed to charge their mobiles wallets with cash and withdraw cash from their mobile wallets.

India cannot go completely cashless. No corrupt country can go cashless. Bribes are the engine oil that makes the corrupt economies run. Making a corrupt country totally cashless, will cause its economy to come to a stand-still.
Totally cashless society is a dream of governments. It has not yet been achieved anywhere in world. So how can India become totally cashless?


Tuesday, 8 November 2016

India bans existing ₹500 and ₹1000 notes

The official reason for this ban is to curb black money and eliminate fake notes from the system. These reasons are fake

  • Indian government since Independence is trying to eliminate black money. So why is there a need to ban notes now? The reason is clearly fake.
  • Fake notes could have been eliminated by announcing a future date (6 months in advance) before actually banning the notes. So even this reason is fake.

The government says it will bring new ₹500 and ₹2000 notes. But these will take many months (maybe years) to come into main stream circulation.
The real reason for banning these notes is that the government wants to squeeze more taxes from people. It becomes more difficult to hide transactions when people are forced to use electronic payments.

So the Indian government will deliberately delay mass scale printing of new ₹500 and ₹2000 notes. Indians should

  • Start using mobile payment apps (like Paytm), instead of cash.
  • Hoard food items as in short run shortages may develop.
  • Withdraw as much cash as possible from banks.
  • Load multiple currency transaction apps (Paytm, FreeCharge, MobiKwik, Airtel Money, Vodafone M-pesa and Oxigen Wallet) on your mobile and distribute transactions among them.
  • Protest against government's decision to ban cash by voting for opposition parties in coming state elections.

Removal of a currency from the market is deflationary. There will be job losses in private sector. The stock market will fall. Real estate prices will fall.
To combat this deflation, the government will reduce interest rates (and reserve ratios for banks) by a huge percentage. Expect your EMI to get lesser, but this may not be of net benefit for most people because inflation will rise.

If you have a lot of black money in cash, then

  1. Buy physical gold/silver at your local jeweler.
  2. Gold is about ₹31,500 for 10gms, but you will have to shell out a much higher amount e.g. ₹50,000 while paying cash.
  3. The jeweler will likely bribe some officials to convert the black money to white. Hence this huge margin over official gold/silver price.
  4. You can sell gold/silver for cash a few months later, when enough new cash has entered the system.
You will likely lose a huge percentage of your black money, thanks to Modi.

Tuesday, 1 November 2016

Renunciation

Renunciation is NOT

  • Living in solitude
  • Eating once a day
  • Any external appearance e.g. shaving head, wearing special clothes, etc.
  • Chanting some special scriptures.
  • Meditating with closed eyes.
  • Allowing others to insult / harm you.
In fact, all above forms of renunciation are likely to cause more harm than good, when unaccompanied by a mental maturity.

Real Renunciation is living in peace with oneself. The person may live in solitude or in a crowd. The person may eat any number of times a day. The person may not wear any special clothes. The person may not know scriptures. The person may not meditate with closed eyes. The person may use violence for self-defense.
Real Renunciation is difficult because it involves giving up of wrong ideas and accepting the Truth about oneself.
Real Renunciation is difficult. Fake renunciation (living in solitude, etc) are relatively easy.


Sunday, 30 October 2016

USA elections

Personally I am endorsing Gary Johnson for President, but it does not seem likely that he will win. So in my opinion, the outcome during the next few weeks is mentioned below.

Friday, 7 October 2016

Indian spectrum auction fails.

Indian government conducted an auction for sale of spectrum. The auction earned about 11% of the expected revenue. So overall the auction was a failure.

The question is why did the auction fail?
The auction failed because government bureaucrats decided the price of the spectrum. Ideally, the market should decide the price of the spectrum.

The auction is conducted by bidding. So the base price can be kept very small. If the spectrum deserves a higher price, then during bidding the price will rise to the level that market is willing to pay.

The failure in spectrum auction shows the incompetency of Indian government. The respective minister and bureaucrats should resign.